Later vs Metricool: Which Social Media Tool Should You Choose?
Later wins for Instagram-first visual planning and calendar previews. Metricool wins for unified analytics, competitor tracking, and data-driven decision making.
TL;DR
| Later | Metricool | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Instagram-first creators who need visual feed planning | Data-driven marketers who need competitor benchmarking |
| Free plan | Yes — 1 social set, 10 posts/mo | Yes — unlimited brands, basic analytics |
| Starting price | $25/mo (Starter) | €22/mo (Pro) |
| G2 rating | 4.5/5 (800+) | 4.5/5 (600+) |
| Not ideal for | Teams needing multi-channel workflow depth, approvals, or cross-channel analytics | Teams prioritizing approval workflows, content planning depth, or repurposing |
What kind of comparison is this?
This is not just a feature checklist. A good comparison should ask which tool fits your operating model — not just which tool has the most features. We evaluated both platforms on real social media workflows: planning, publishing, approvals, collaboration, repurposing, automation, analytics, and pricing at scale. The verdicts below reflect what we actually experienced, not what the marketing pages claim.
Metricool
Later wins for Instagram-first visual planning and calendar previews. Metricool wins for unified analytics, competitor tracking, and data-driven decision making.
Later
Still the right choice if instagram-first creators who need visual feed planning.
At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature Area | | | TarenoIncluded for reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| G2 Rating | 4.5/5 (800+ reviews) | 4.5/5 (600+ reviews) | 4.8/5 (growing) |
| Capterra Rating | 4.4/5 (1,800+ reviews) | 4.4/5 (1,200+ reviews) | 4.7/5 (growing) |
| Free Plan | Yes — 1 social set, 10 posts/mo | Yes — unlimited brands, basic analytics | Yes — 2 channels, 15 posts |
| Planning & Strategy | Excellent visual drag-and-drop feed planner focused on Instagram aesthetics. | Basic planner; stronger focus on analytics and reporting than content planning. | Kanban boards, visual calendar, and campaign context across 8+ channels. |
| Publishing Power | Strong Instagram and TikTok scheduling; some content types require manual publishing. | Reliable scheduling with organic + paid campaign management in one dashboard. | Multi-channel scheduling with evergreen queues and bulk actions across all platforms. |
| Team Collaboration | Basic team features; no structured approval workflows in lower tiers. | Limited collaboration features; approvals are not a core strength. | Native approval workflows, role-based access, and team workspaces. |
| Content Repurposing | No native repurposing engine; content reuse is manual. | No native repurposing engine; content reuse requires manual work. | Dedicated repurposing queue for systematic cross-channel content reuse. |
| Analytics & Insights | Instagram-focused analytics; broader cross-channel reporting is limited. | Excellent competitor benchmarking and analytics depth; best-in-class for the price. | Unified analytics, competitor benchmarking, and white-label reports. |
| Workflow Automation | No native workflow builder; relies on basic scheduling automation. | Basic automation; no visual workflow builder for complex operations. | Visual workflow builder plus n8n / Make / Zapier integration on Pro. |
Also considering Tareno?
See how it compares on planning, publishing, analytics, and repurposing.
Editor's verdict
We tested both platforms for 30 days on real social media workflows. Here's what we actually experienced.
Planning & Strategy
Later winsWe were genuinely more impressed with Later than Metricool here. Later keeps planning simple and visual, and the experience feels smoother day-to-day.
Later gives you excellent visual drag-and-drop feed planner focused on instagram aesthetics. Metricool offers basic planner; stronger focus on analytics and reporting than content planning. The difference is that Later keeps planning simple and visual, while Metricool adds strategic depth.
What we didn't like — Later
lacks advanced campaign context
What we didn't like — Metricool
can feel overwhelming for small teams
If you you want a clean, visual way to plan content without getting lost in complex boards, Later is the better pick.
Publishing Power
DrawIt's a toss-up. Both Later and Metricool handle publishing power adequately, but neither blows the other away.
Later gives you strong instagram and tiktok scheduling; some content types require manual publishing. Metricool offers reliable scheduling with organic + paid campaign management in one dashboard. The difference is that Later gets posts out reliably across channels, while Metricool covers a wide range of platforms.
What we didn't like — Later
hits occasional API limitations on newer platforms
What we didn't like — Metricool
has more friction with short-form video formats
Neither tool stands out here — pick based on your other priorities.
Team Collaboration
Metricool winsMetricool takes the lead here. Metricool handles complex approval chains, while Later lacks structured approval gates.
Later gives you basic team features; no structured approval workflows in lower tiers. Metricool offers limited collaboration features; approvals are not a core strength. The difference is that Later keeps collaboration simple and fast, while Metricool handles complex approval chains.
What we didn't like — Later
lacks structured approval gates
What we didn't like — Metricool
adds too much overhead for small teams
If you you're a large enterprise with multi-layer approval requirements, Metricool is the clear choice.
Content Repurposing
DrawIt's a toss-up. Both Later and Metricool handle content repurposing adequately, but neither blows the other away.
Later gives you no native repurposing engine; content reuse is manual. Metricool offers no native repurposing engine; content reuse requires manual work. The difference is that Later has a dedicated engine for reusing content, while Metricool allows some manual reuse.
What we didn't like — Later
is mostly manual copy-paste
What we didn't like — Metricool
has no native repurposing at all
Neither tool stands out here — pick based on your other priorities.
Analytics & Insights
Metricool winsMetricool takes the lead here. Metricool goes deep on specific metrics, while Later is surface-level on lower tiers.
Later gives you instagram-focused analytics; broader cross-channel reporting is limited. Metricool offers excellent competitor benchmarking and analytics depth; best-in-class for the price. The difference is that Later delivers unified, actionable analytics, while Metricool goes deep on specific metrics.
What we didn't like — Later
is surface-level on lower tiers
What we didn't like — Metricool
can be overwhelming or locked behind expensive plans
If you you need deep, customizable reporting for stakeholders, Metricool is the clear choice.
Workflow Automation
DrawIt's a toss-up. Both Later and Metricool handle workflow automation adequately, but neither blows the other away.
Later gives you no native workflow builder; relies on basic scheduling automation. Metricool offers basic automation; no visual workflow builder for complex operations. The difference is that Later offers a visual builder for custom workflows, while Metricool has some scheduling automation.
What we didn't like — Later
relies on third-party integrations
What we didn't like — Metricool
has no visual workflow builder
Neither tool stands out here — pick based on your other priorities.
When to choose which tool
Choose Later if...
- you are Instagram-first and need visual feed planning, drag-and-drop calendars, and link-in-bio
- Your team is visual-first and Instagram-only.
- You don't mind instagram-centric — other channels feel secondary.
Best for
Instagram-first creators who need visual feed planning
Landing page screenshot — 2026-05-08
Choose Metricool if...
- you need unified analytics, competitor benchmarking, and performance reporting across channels
- Your team is data-driven and report-heavy.
- You don't mind no native approval workflows.
Best for
Data-driven marketers who need competitor benchmarking
Landing page screenshot — 2026-05-08
Where each tool wins
Later is stronger when...
- Best-in-class visual Instagram planning
- Drag-and-drop content calendar
- Link-in-bio page builder
- Hashtag suggestions
Metricool is stronger when...
- Excellent unified analytics dashboard
- Competitor tracking and benchmarking
- Great value for the feature set
- Unlimited brands on all plans
When neither is the best fit
Neither is ideal if you need multi-channel workflow depth — approvals, repurposing, automation — beyond their core strengths. Later is Instagram-centric; Metricool is analytics-centric.
What users actually say
Later
What users love
Instagram-first creators who need visual feed planning
Common complaints
- Instagram-centric — other channels feel secondary
- No structured approval system
- Limited cross-channel analytics
Metricool
What users love
Data-driven marketers who need competitor benchmarking
Common complaints
- No native approval workflows
- Limited content planning depth
- No repurposing engine
Practical scenarios
Scenario 1: Solo creator with 3 channels
You manage your own Instagram, TikTok, and LinkedIn. You post 3–5 times per week and don't need approvals or client reports.Better fit: Later if you want simplicity and visual planning.
Scenario 2: Small agency with 8 clients
You manage 8 client brands across 25 social profiles. Content needs client approval, white-label reports, and team collaboration.Better fit: Metricool if you need analytics, reporting, or enterprise features.
Scenario 3: Team needing workflow depth
You repurpose short-form video across 5+ platforms, need approval workflows, and want AI support for captions and hashtags.Consider Tareno if neither Later nor Metricool covers planning, repurposing, approvals, and automation in one system.
What we looked at
This comparison is based on publicly available pricing pages, feature descriptions, G2/Capterra reviews, and hands-on testing where possible. We prioritize primary sources over third-party claims.
Pricing deep dive
Later
Free plan: Yes — 1 social set, 10 posts/mo
Screenshot evidence — 2026-05-08
Metricool
Free plan: Yes — unlimited brands, basic analytics
Screenshot evidence — 2026-05-08
Tareno — for comparison
Tareno covers both visual planning and analytics basics, then adds approvals, repurposing, and automation that neither tool offers.
Metricool vs Metricool: Which Social Media Management Tool Should You Choose in 2026?
Metricool and Metricool are both strong social media tools, but they are built around different buying reasons. Choose Metricool if your priority is analytics, competitor tracking, multi-brand reporting, unlimited analytics history, PDF/PPT reports, Looker Studio, API access, ads visibility, and data-driven planning. Choose Metricool if your priority is visual planning, Social Sets, creator-friendly scheduling, Link in Bio, Instagram/TikTok workflows, collaboration, approvals, and visual campaign organization.
If neither tool fully solves the workflow problem, consider Tareno when your team needs boards, approvals, workflow automation, repurposing, role-based collaboration, activity visibility, competitor analysis, API access, and Make or n8n workflows.
Quick definition: what are Metricool and Metricool?
Metricool is a social media management and analytics platform focused on planning, publishing, analytics, reports, competitor tracking, inbox, smart links, ads visibility, multi-brand management, team/client management on higher plans, role management, post approvals, customizable reports, Looker Studio, and API access with Zapier, Make, and MCP on Advanced.
Metricool is a visual social media planning platform focused on Social Sets, profile-group planning, content calendars, Link in Bio, creator workflows, visual scheduling, collaboration, approvals, analytics, and competitive benchmarking on higher plans.
The simplest distinction is:
Metricool is analytics-and-reporting-first. Metricool is visual-planning-first.
That distinction matters because both tools can schedule posts, but they are not optimized for the same social media workflow.
How we evaluated Metricool vs Metricool
This comparison uses a workflow-first model rather than only counting features.
We evaluated both tools across eight dimensions:
- Analytics and reporting — how well each platform measures performance.
- Competitor analysis — whether competitor tracking is accessible and useful.
- Visual planning — how well the tool supports profile previews, media planning, and creator workflows.
- Profile structure — whether the tool scales by brands or Social Sets.
- Collaboration and approvals — whether teams can review content before publishing.
- Pricing at scale — whether plans make sense as brands, Social Sets, users, and profiles grow.
- API and integrations — whether external workflows are supported.
- Workflow depth — whether the tool can support boards, approvals, repurposing, automation, roles, and activity visibility.
This matters because “Metricool vs Metricool” is usually a choice between two different social systems: data-first management or visual planning.
The DATA-VISUAL framework for choosing between Metricool and Metricool
D — Data depth
If your team needs analytics history, reports, competitor tracking, API, and Looker Studio, Metricool is usually stronger.
A — Agency reports
If the output is client reports, brand dashboards, competitor insights, and monthly performance review, Metricool is stronger.
T — TikTok/Instagram visual workflow
If the workflow is creator-led and visual, Metricool is usually stronger.
A — Account structure
Metricool scales by brands. Metricool scales by Social Sets and profiles.
V — Visual planning
Metricool is the better fit when content appearance, profile grouping, Link in Bio, and visual planning matter.
I — Integrations
Metricool Advanced has a stronger public API/Make/MCP signal.
S — Strategy type
Choose Metricool for measurement strategy. Choose Metricool for visual content planning.
Workflow beyond both
If the workflow requires boards, approvals, repurposing, workflow builder, roles, activity visibility, API, Make, and n8n, evaluate Tareno.
Where Metricool is still the better choice
Metricool is the better fit when social media decisions start with performance data.
It is especially relevant for consultants, agencies, and social teams that need analytics, competitor analysis, reporting, brand dashboards, and external integrations.
Choose Metricool if analytics are the main reason you are buying
Metricool’s strongest advantage is analytics.
The captured pricing screenshot shows:
- Free plan with 30 days analytics
- Starter with analytics with unlimited history
- PDF and PPT reports
- Advanced with customizable report templates
- Looker Studio connector
- competitor profile analysis
- team/client management on Advanced
- role management and post approval system on Advanced
That makes Metricool strong if your team needs to answer:
- Which posts performed best?
- Which platforms are growing?
- Which competitors are gaining traction?
- What should go into a client report?
- Which campaign should be repeated?
- What should change next month?
Metricool has analytics, but it is more visual-planning-first.
Choose Metricool if competitor tracking matters
Metricool makes competitor analysis accessible.
The captured pricing screenshot shows:
- Free: analyze 5 competitor profiles
- Starter: analyze up to 100 competitors
- Advanced: broader reporting and API features
Metricool Scale includes competitive benchmarking, but Metricool makes competitor tracking more visible earlier in the pricing structure.
Choose Metricool if your team thinks in brands
Metricool’s pricing is organized around brands.
The captured screenshot shows:
- Free: manage 1 brand
- Starter: manage up to 10 brands
- Advanced: manage up to 50 brands
- Custom: custom number of brands
That structure fits:
- consultants
- agencies
- multi-brand operators
- social media managers
- teams producing recurring reports by brand
Metricool is better if you think in Social Sets and profile groups. Metricool is better if you think in brands and reports.
Choose Metricool if API and reporting integrations matter
Metricool Advanced includes Metricool API with Zapier, Make, and MCP in the captured screenshot.
That is useful if your team wants to connect analytics, reports, or dashboards to external systems.
Metricool is stronger for visual planning, but Metricool has the clearer API/integration story in the captured data.
Where Metricool is still the better choice
Metricool is the better fit when social media planning is visual, creator-led, and profile-group-based.
It is especially relevant for brands and creators that care about Instagram, TikTok, visual content calendars, Link in Bio, and profile-set planning.
Choose Metricool if visual planning matters
Metricool’s strongest advantage is visual planning.
The captured pricing screenshot shows Starter, Growth, and Scale plans structured around Social Sets, profiles, and users. Metricool help docs define Social Sets as groups of social profiles across supported platforms.
This makes Metricool a strong fit for:
- Instagram creators
- TikTok-first brands
- ecommerce social content
- visual content calendars
- profile-group planning
- Link in Bio workflows
- visual-first brand calendars
Metricool can schedule and analyze, but Metricool is more naturally visual-planning-first.
Choose Metricool if Social Sets match your structure
Metricool’s captured pricing screenshot shows:
- Starter: 1 Social Set, 8 profiles total, 1 user
- Growth: 2 Social Sets, 16 profiles total, 2 users
- Scale: 6 Social Sets, 48 profiles total, 4 users
This structure makes sense when your team thinks in profile groups.
For example:
- one creator brand across multiple platforms
- several brands grouped by Social Sets
- a creator-led team managing Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Pinterest, LinkedIn, and Threads
- a visual brand that wants each profile group planned together
Metricool is better if you think in brands and analytics. Metricool is better if you think in profile groups and content appearance.
Choose Metricool if Link in Bio matters
Metricool is stronger if Link in Bio is part of the conversion workflow.
If posts connect to creator links, ecommerce links, campaigns, or link-in-bio destinations, Metricool has a more natural fit.
Metricool has multiple link-in-bio on Starter in the captured screenshot, but Metricool’s brand is more closely tied to creator profile workflows.
Pricing comparison: Metricool vs Metricool
Pricing changes, so verify all numbers before publishing. This draft uses captured pricing screenshots.
Metricool pricing model
The captured Metricool annual USD screenshot shows:
- Free: $0/month, 1 brand, 20 posts/month, 5 competitor profiles, 30 days analytics, AI social media assistant.
- Starter: from $20/month, up to 10 brands, unlimited content publishing, up to 100 competitors, LinkedIn connection, PDF/PPT reports, multiple link-in-bio, analytics with unlimited history, Google Drive and Canva integration.
- Advanced: from $53/month, up to 50 brands, team and client management, role management, post approval system, full Twitter/X analytics, customizable report templates, Looker Studio connector, Metricool API with Zapier, Make, and MCP.
- Custom: custom number of brands, Metricool integration, white label, dedicated account manager, custom AI assistant credits.
Metricool is strongest when analytics, reporting, competitor tracking, brands, and API access are the buying reasons.
Metricool pricing model
Metricool’s captured annual pricing screenshot shows:
- Starter: $18.75/month, 1 Social Set, 8 profiles total, 1 user, schedule up to 30 posts per profile, AI content tools, platform analytics up to 3 months, and Link in Bio.
- Growth: $37.50/month, 2 Social Sets, 16 profiles total, 2 users, Smart Scheduling with Future Trends, internal collaboration and approvals, and external workflow and approvals.
- Scale: $82.50/month, 6 Social Sets, 48 profiles total, 4 users, custom analytics, competitive benchmarking, and future industry insights.
- Metricool help docs explain that Starter is limited to 1 user and 1 Social Set, while Growth and Scale can add users and Social Sets.
Metricool is strongest when Social Sets, profile groups, visual planning, and creator workflows are the buying model.
Pricing verdict
| Situation | Better pricing fit |
|---|---|
| 1 brand needing analytics | Metricool Free/Starter |
| 1 visual profile group | Metricool Starter |
| consultant needing reports | Metricool |
| creator needing Link in Bio and visual planning | Metricool |
| agency needing competitor profiles | Metricool |
| team needing internal/external approvals around visual planning | Metricool Growth |
| team needing API/Make/MCP | Metricool Advanced |
| team needing workflow builder, boards, repurposing, roles, activity visibility, API, Make/n8n | Consider Tareno |
The pricing question is not:
“Which tool is cheaper?”
The better question is:
“Are you paying for analytics and brand reporting, or visual profile-set planning?”
Feature comparison
Analytics and reporting
Metricool wins analytics and reporting.
Its captured pricing screenshot makes analytics history, PDF/PPT reports, customizable templates, Looker Studio, competitor profiles, and brand dashboards very visible.
Metricool has analytics, but analytics is more connected to visual planning and creator workflow.
Verdict: Metricool wins for analytics and reporting.
Competitor analysis
Metricool wins accessible competitor tracking.
Free includes 5 competitor profiles, and Starter includes up to 100 competitors in the captured screenshot. Metricool Scale includes competitive benchmarking, but at a higher visual-planning plan level.
Verdict: Metricool wins for competitor analysis.
Visual planning
Metricool wins visual planning.
Its Social Sets, profile-group structure, visual content workflow, and creator positioning make it stronger.
Verdict: Metricool wins for visual planning.
Creator workflows
Metricool wins for creator workflows.
It is better for Instagram/TikTok-first teams, Link in Bio, visual calendars, and profile groups.
Verdict: Metricool wins for creator-led workflows.
Brand management
Metricool wins if brand management means reporting and analytics by brand. Metricool wins if brand management means visually planning profile groups.
Verdict: Metricool for reports; Metricool for visual profile planning.
API and integrations
Metricool Advanced wins because the captured screenshot explicitly includes Metricool API with Zapier, Make, and MCP.
Verdict: Metricool wins for API/Make/MCP visibility.
Workflow automation and repurposing
Neither Metricool nor Metricool is primarily a full workflow automation and repurposing platform.
If the team needs workflow builder, repurposing queue, boards, roles, activity visibility, API, Make, and n8n workflows, Tareno is stronger.
Verdict: Tareno wins when workflow automation and repurposing are central.
Choose Metricool if...
Choose Metricool if you want:
- analytics-first social management
- competitor profile tracking
- brand-based management
- PDF and PPT reports
- unlimited analytics history on paid plans
- multiple link-in-bio pages
- Google Drive and Canva integration
- team/client management on Advanced
- role management on Advanced
- post approval system on Advanced
- customizable report templates
- Looker Studio connector
- Metricool API with Zapier, Make, and MCP
Metricool is the better choice when your main question is:
“How do we plan, measure, benchmark, and report social media performance across brands?”
Avoid Metricool if...
Avoid Metricool if:
- visual planning is the main reason you are buying
- Social Sets match your structure better
- Instagram/TikTok creator workflows are the main priority
- Link in Bio and visual profile planning matter more than analytics
- you need workflow automation, repurposing queues, boards, roles, and activity visibility
Choose Metricool if...
Choose Metricool if you want:
- visual planning
- Social Sets
- profile-group planning
- Instagram/TikTok-first workflows
- Link in Bio
- creator-friendly scheduling
- AI content tools
- platform analytics
- internal/external approvals on Growth/Scale
- competitive benchmarking on Scale
- visual campaign organization
Metricool is the better choice when your main question is:
“How do we visually plan social content across profile groups?”
Avoid Metricool if...
Avoid Metricool if:
- analytics and reporting are the main reason you are buying
- competitor tracking is critical
- brand-based reports matter more than visual planning
- API/Make/MCP matters
- you need workflow automation, repurposing queues, boards, roles, and activity visibility
When neither Metricool nor Metricool is ideal
Sometimes the real problem is not Metricool vs Metricool.
The real problem is that social media workflows are disconnected:
- visual planning happens in one place
- analytics happen somewhere else
- approvals are manual
- high-performing content is not repurposed
- competitor insights do not become workflows
- roles are unclear
- activity history is not visible
- Make/n8n automations are separate from the content calendar
In that case, a workflow-first platform may be better.
Optional Tareno alternative: when workflow depth matters more
Tareno is not a Metricool clone and not a Metricool clone. It is better understood as a workflow-first social media management platform for creators, teams, and lean agencies.
Consider Tareno if your team needs:
- Workflow Builder for triggers, delays, schedules, and social actions
- Repurposing Queue to reuse high-performing content across platforms
- Kanban Content Boards for planning, review, and production
- Team Workspaces for brands, clients, or operating areas
- Approval Workflows so content does not go live without review
- Roles and permissions for team workflows
- Activity visibility to see what group members changed or moved
- Competitor Analysis to connect benchmarking to execution
- Unified Analytics and white-label reports
- AI Captions and AI Hashtags
- API access
- Make integration
- n8n integration
The honest summary is:
- Metricool = analytics, competitor tracking, reports, brand management
- Metricool = visual planning, Social Sets, Link in Bio, creator workflows
- Tareno = workflow automation, repurposing, boards, roles, and social operations
Practical scenarios
Scenario 1: Consultant managing multiple brands
Best fit: Metricool
Metricool is stronger for brand-based analytics, reports, and competitor tracking.
Scenario 2: Instagram-first creator
Best fit: Metricool
Metricool is stronger for visual planning, Social Sets, and Link in Bio.
Scenario 3: Agency needing competitor profiles
Best fit: Metricool
Metricool makes competitor tracking visible in the pricing structure.
Scenario 4: Creator team with multiple profile groups
Best fit: Metricool Growth or Scale
Metricool’s Social Sets match profile-group planning.
Scenario 5: Team needing API/Make/MCP
Best fit: Metricool Advanced
Metricool Advanced includes API with Zapier, Make, and MCP in the captured screenshot.
Scenario 6: Team needing planning, approvals, repurposing, and automation
Best fit: Tareno
Tareno is stronger when the workflow needs boards, approvals, repurposing, workflow builder, roles, activity visibility, API, Make, and n8n.
Final recommendation
If your question is:
“How do we plan, measure, benchmark competitors, and report social media performance across brands?”
Choose Metricool.
If your question is:
“How do we visually plan social content across profile groups?”
Choose Metricool.
If your question is:
“How do we run the whole workflow from planning and approval to repurposing, automation, analytics, roles, and team visibility?”
Consider Tareno.
Source links for verification
- Metricool Pricing: https://Metricool.com/pricing/
- Metricool Features: https://Metricool.com/
- Metricool Pricing: https://Metricool.com/pricing
- Metricool Help / Plans: https://help.Metricool.com/hc/en-us/articles/360059362253-Choosing-a-Metricool-Social-Plan
- Metricool Social Sets Add-ons: https://help.Metricool.com/hc/en-us/articles/360055240773-Managing-Metricool-Plan-Add-ons-Users-Social-Sets
- Tareno Features: https://tareno.co/features
- Tareno Pricing: https://tareno.co/pricing
- Tareno API Docs: https://tareno.co/docs/api
- Tareno Make Docs: https://tareno.co/docs/make
- Tareno n8n Docs: https://tareno.co/docs/n8n
A third option worth considering.
We built Tareno because we got tired of choosing between Later's tareno connects visual planning with scheduling, ai content support, repurposing, and reporting across more of the social operation — treating every channel as a first-class citizen and Metricool's tareno pairs product workflows with a large public free-tool library, creating stronger bridges from utility tasks to paid social operations — all in one connected workflow. Tareno gives you both in one connected workflow — without the later pricing or the metricool complexity.
Related comparisons
Explore Tareno
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: Later or Metricool?
After testing both for 30 days, Metricool is the better pick for most teams — data-driven marketers who need competitor benchmarking. Later is still the right choice if instagram-first creators who need visual feed planning. Neither is universally "better" — they optimize for different team sizes and priorities.
Can I switch between Later and Metricool easily?
Yes, but expect 1-2 weeks of adjustment. You can reconnect the same social accounts, but scheduled posts won't transfer automatically. The bigger issue is workflow adaptation — switching from Later to Metricool means adjusting to a different interface. CSV import helps, but you'll need to rebuild your content calendar.
What do real users say about Later vs Metricool?
Later scores 4.5/5 on G2 (800+ reviews) and 4.4/5 on Capterra. Metricool scores 4.5/5 on G2 (600+ reviews) and 4.4/5 on Capterra. The most common praise for Later: users love its visual planning. The biggest complaint: Instagram-centric — other channels feel secondary. For Metricool: users praise its analytics. The biggest complaint: No native approval workflows.
Why is Tareno included in this comparison?
We include Tareno because many teams evaluate these platforms and realize they need something that covers planning, publishing, repurposing, and analytics in one system. Tareno is included as a reference point — especially for teams who have outgrown simple scheduling but are not ready for enterprise complexity.
What is the real cost difference at scale?
At 5 channels and 3 team members: Later costs approximately $135/mo. Metricool costs approximately €22/mo. Tareno Pro is €23/mo for 5 team members and 15 channels. The gap widens significantly as you scale.
Does Later or Metricool have a free plan?
Later: Yes — 1 social set, 10 posts/mo. Metricool: Yes — unlimited brands, basic analytics. Tareno: Yes — 2 channels, 15 posts, no credit card required.
Sources and references
Metricool
Pricing verified: 2026-05-02 (A) · 2026-05-02 (B). Prices change frequently — verify directly before purchasing.